Cancer Alley, Louisiana is an area along the Mississippi River between Baton Rouge and New Orleans. It derived its notorious nickname, Cancer Alley, from the abundance of oil refineries and petrochemical companies along the river. It is already known that this area has an unusually high rate of cancers, which is attributed to the air and water contamination by industry. Environmental Racism in Cancer Alley, Louisiana has previously been explored but mostly in terms of cancer. This study will be exploring the other potential health risks that people living in Cancer Alley experience compared to the rest of Louisiana. This study will also look at other factors that could explain differences in quality of health by county.
The state of Louisiana is known for having very limited environmental regulations and therefore very high levels of pollution. Louisiana was ranked by US News as the worst pollution state in terms of exposure to pollution and related health risks. Additionally, there are numerous articles documenting the lack of enforcement of federal clean air, clean water, and hazardous waste laws. The lack of environmental regulation is part of the reason for the abundance of industrial sites in the state. High levels of industry and low levels of environmental protection have led to adverse health impacts throughout the state. Previous studies have documented the effects of these industrial sites on the number of cancer cases in the state.
There are measures of increased cancer risk and racial data for some of the counties along what is known as Cancer Alley. For instance, the lifetime risk of cancer in St. John Baptist is 800 times higher than an average american (Pasley 2020). Nationally, there has been a 16% decrease in toxic releases by plants over the last 30 year, but in Cancer Alley reported toxic releases grew by 25%. It is also noted that these oil refinery and chemical plants are located next to African American communities along the Mississippi River (Pasley 2020).
This study will be focused on exploring race and health data in the state of Louisiana to assess whether there is a link between health problems and race, particularly in Cancer Alley. It is important to note that this study is limited to looking at data by counties, though Cancer Alley itself is not entire counties. Populations that are closer to the industries and the Mississippi River (where these industries dump waste) are more likely to be impacted in terms of health. Since the study looks at health in Louisiana at a county level, it is possible that the adverse health impacts to communities on the river will not be reflected by the county-wide data.
Three difference R packages were utilized to create the following analysis. The dplyr package was used extensively to create new descriptive variables and reorganize and restructure data frames to facilitate the analysis. The ggplot2 package was used in order to visualize the analysis through the creation of a variety of different plot types. Finally, the tidyr package was used to combine data from the race and health datasets so that they could be analyzed on the same plot.
The first portion of my analysis will focus on race data for counties that are considered to be part of Cancer Alley. These counties include: East Baton Rouge, West Baton Rouge, Ascension, St. John the Baptist, Iberville, St. Charles, Jefferson, and Orleans. My analysis will explore the differences in diversity of these areas compared to one another and the state as a whole. This will be followed by a discussion of the limitation of my racial analysis given the structure of the data.
The second part of my analysis will look at race and health data in the entire state of Louisiana. This portion of the analysis will focus on finding correlation between poor health and percentage of minorities in a county. This will include a scatter plot that examines health as a function of percentage of minorities in the community. This will give a more holistic view of Louisiana’s health by race. This will be followed by theoretical qq-plots to assess the normality of the data and isolate particular counties in Louisiana that appear to be in worse health. The health data will then be compared to other states in the United States to assess Louisiana’s statewide health compared to national health.
The third part of my analysis will focus primarily on the health in the counties that are part of Cancer Alley. This portion of the analysis uses a box plot to compare the percentage poor health in the counties of Cancer Valley, Louisiana to percentage poor health in the state and country as a whole.
The final portion of my analysis will review other factors that could be contributing to adverse health effects. This will involve an evaluation of the potential impact of lack of health insurance on Louisiana. This will be demonstrated through box plots that will compare the lack of insurance by age in the US and lack of insurance by age in Louisiana. Comparing the difference between National lack of insurance to just state lack of insurance in Louisiana will give us a better idea of if insurance (or lack thereof) can be used to explain the health disparity between most U.S. States and Louisiana. Next, this section will explore potential causes of obesity in Louisiana, which is shown in section 2 (“Comparing Race and Health Data for the Entire State of Louisiana”) to have the second highest rate of obesity in the US. This analysis will involve the use of scatterplots to compare obesity in Louisiana to access to healthy foods and physical inactivity.
The first plot is a bar plot comparing the percentage white population in all the Cancer Alley counties. The red line on this plot represents the average percentage of white residents in each county, which is 65%. Of the counties that are part of Cancer Alley, five have a lower percentage of white population than the rest of the state of Louisiana. These five counties include East Baton Rouge, Iberville, Orleans, St. John the Baptist, and West Baton Rouge. These data suggest that much of the population that lives in Cancer Alley is not white. As previous studies have implicated Cancer Alley as a location with high levels of environmental racism, it should be expected that these communities are largely composed of minorities. The fact that three of these counties (Ascension, Jefferson, and St. Charles) have a higher percentage white population than the rest of the state is more than I expected.
Due to the high percentage white population in Ascension, Jefferson, and St. Charles, I found a more precise map of race along Cancer Alley which is shown below.
The above image shows the percentage of the population along the Mississippi River (Cancer Alley) that is black, while also indicating the locations of major industrial sites along the river. It appears that many of these industrial sites are located in areas with high percentages of black populations from 60-100%. The proximity of these majority black communities to industrial sites is an indication of environmental racism.
It is important to note the difference in the discoveries of my own graph and those in the above image. While the image clearly points to environmental racism, my graph suggests that only some of the counties that comprise Cancer Alley are majority non-White. The reason for this discrepancy is that the image looks at a smaller than county level. The health data is limited to the county level and can not be broken down into smaller increments. This highlights one of the limitations of this study, which is that among a county there can be a very high variability among the data. While the image clearly shows high percentages of black populations near industrial sites, my data looks at the diversity of the entire counties which extend miles from the Mississippi River and these industrial sites.
The limitation of this dataset of being broken down by county, instead of even smaller regions, will be important to the rest of the analysis. While people along the Mississippi River may experience adverse health impacts, this may not be reflected in the health data as it will be diluted by the rest of the county’s health.
It is important to understand the overall health of minorities in Louisiana to assess whether there is environmental racism. The below chart plots the percentage of minorities against the percentage of poor health by county.
The above plot demonstrates that there is a correlation between percentage minorities and poor health. The plot has both a linear slope and a loess fit to determine if a linear slope best represents the data. The loess fit follows the linear slope pretty well until the last portion of the data where it increases because of the three outliers. The plot suggests that as the percentage of minorities in the population increases the percentage of fair to poor health reported also increases. This suggests that overall, in the state of Louisiana, there could be a connection between poor health and the counties with more minorities. Environmental racism is a potential explanation for this trend, but the potential causes for the fair to poor health of the minorities would need to be evaluated. The “Other Factors that could be Impacting Health” section will further discuss potential reasons for this trend.
To determine if there were any regions in Louisiana that were particular outliers in terms of poor health or premature deaths, I created qq-plots of these data. Considering previous findings in Cancer Alley of negative health effects, I expected to find outliers in these data for the counties in Cancer Alley. Though there were some outliers in both the poor health and premature death data, neither indicated any of the counties in Cancer Alley as outliers.
The plot above shows that the Fair to Poor Health data has a relatively normal distribution with the exception of 3 counties. These three counties are Tensas, Madison, and East Carroll, none of which are part of or nearby Cancer Alley. Looking at the next Theoretical QQ plot of premature deaths helps direct attention to a possible explanation for these outliers.
The theoretical QQ plot of premature deaths in Louisiana shows that these data do not have a normal distribution. Deaths were considered to be Premature if they were before the age of 75. Interestingly, Tensas has the second lowest, East Carroll has the third lowest, and Madison has the eighth lowest number of premature deaths. Considering the last QQ plot, where these counties were outliers for having higher reported percentages of fair to poor health, it would be expected for these counties to likely have higher levels of premature deaths. The reason these counties have such a lower premature death count is because they have much smaller total populations than many of the other counties in Louisiana. This could also be a potential explanation for why they had higher percentages of fair to poor health, because there just were not as many data points for people as the counties are smaller. This means that each person’s response in these counties impacts the overall county health evaluation more than people’s responses in larger counties. The upper three outliers on the theoretical QQ plot of premature deaths were Jefferson, East Baton Rouge, and Orleans. All of these counties are a part of Cancer Alley, but they also all have very large population sizes compared to the other counties in Louisiana, which is likely the explanation of their much higher number of premature deaths.
The next three plots will compare the health of Louisiana to other U.S. states. The red line on all the plots indicates the value that corresponds with the state of Louisiana. The states are numbered but do not labelled, as the focus is solely on the state of Louisiana compared to the other states. The spaces where there are bars missing indicate a lack of health data for these 5 states.
Looking at these plots it is very clear that, compared to other U.S. states, the population in Louisiana overall has some of the worst health. The first plot indicates that Louisiana is in the top 5 states that had the highest reported fair or poor health. The second plot indicates that Louisiana has the seventh highest Premature Mortality Rate per 100,000 population of all the US States. The third plot indicates that Louisiana has the second highest percentage obese persons of all of the US States.
The high rates of poor health, premature deaths, and obesity suggest that Louisiana is in much worse health by comparison to other U.S. states. The poor overall health of Louisiana could possibly have connections to their weak environmental regulations, which enable industrial waste to contaminate their air and water. That said, further research would be needed to fully demonstrate a link between their lack of environmental regulation and adverse health impacts. ### Cancer Alley Health Data
The next plot will hone in on health data specifically in Cancer Alley, Louisiana to determine if there is a correlation between poor health and these counties. The navy blue line represents the average percent reported fair or poor health in all of the United States. The red line represents the average percent reported fair or poor health in the state of Louisiana.
The percentage of poor health in Cancer Alley, Louisiana counties is at or above the poor health reported in the United States. That said, most percentages of fair or poor health reported in these counties are below the average for Louisiana. This indicates that there tend to be higher levels of poor health in Louisiana than in the United States. Whether poor health is, in fact, affected by living in Cancer Alley can not be determined by this graph. The health impacts of living in Cancer Alley would need to be assessed at a level that is smaller than the county level to definitively convey adverse health impacts on the communities in and closest to the Cancer Alley region along the Mississippi River.